Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Are we going to have the pair of Athenais + Ludia join forces every time to literally go down all of the most bloody and bad moments of french history because the game paints every time the "optimal choice" to be the one that literally creates the next disaster?
The game also depicts Robespierre as an upstanding citizen of high morality, noble ideals, and grand presence, with literally zero faults.
Unless this is a setup for the sequel where we will aid some "friend" of La Fayette against the reign of terror of Robespeierre, and that friend turns out to be Napoleon at the end of the game (i mean... they started as friends before Napoleon deciding he liked to be king and imprisoned him)...
...uhm...
Hindsight is 20/20 but that guy literally had an idiotic attitude about "talking sense" which did resulted in way too many deaths because people were foaming at their mouths.
So... do we "know history" or do we "get what the game says"? Because we cannot have both.
Historically Robespierre started out as a slightly paranoid hot headed revolutionary and kept being a paranoid hot headed revolutionary, if anything getting hotter and hotter headed and more and more paranoid until his answer to __*everything*__ was a very red-queen "off with their heads". I mean: "Reign Of Terror" is a phrase that was literally coined thanks to Robespierre. I was extremely wary of him from the beginning. :sweat_smile:
The Jimquisition did an episode on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdS2Dkllzws and i disagree with "it's not political" and "it does not explore issues". It is totally about exploring issues of what is the difference between free will and while it assumes souls exist... it does not assume a soul is an individual. Which is nice.
Okay i finished `SteelRising` or `AcierLevant` as i jokingly call it due to the badly used and badly placed french in the game. 120th level (because it is literally impossible to have more), and lots of weapons to level 5, 4 and the rest level 3.
For a developer (Spiders) which is literally a french company with french people one would think the "french" part of the game would **__*not*__** be a problem. That... was not the case.
- it was a great game and very fun.
- the ending was super rushed.
- i honestly do not understand the people who said the story makes no sense. it all makes very much sense. it is also very rushed.
- the ending is fitting though i believe it was written like that for a sequel.
- i honestly thought the queen would have died. but i saved her except she disappears? That is the only thing i did not like.
- but yeah i can confirm that the protagonist gets treated too much like a human being by the vast majority of the animations and by he stuff she uses.
- loved the way that they tied the souls found on both people and automatons.
everything else seems to just make the crashes happen sooner.