+REP

Good trader very helpful

In August 2015, Russia's Yekaterinburg region considered the banning of Beevor's books, accusing him of Nazi sympathies, citing his lack of Russian sources when writing about Russia, and claiming he had promoted false stereotypes introduced by Nazi Germany during World War II.[17][18][19] Beevor responded by calling the banning "a government trying to impose its own version of history", comparing it to other "attempts to dictate a truth", such as denial of the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide.

In January 2018, Beevor's book about the Battle of Stalingrad was banned in Ukraine. Beevor told RFE/RL: "I must say, this sounds absolutely astonishing. There's certainly nothing inherently anti-Ukrainian in the book at all."[20]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Beevor

He's just a charlatan "historian".

I'm not a Nazi or a Neo-Nazi. This conversation end here, if you want read :
Antony Beevor, Berlin: The Downfall 1945
Another comment on my profile about this will be deleted. See you.

Thing with wikipedia is anyone can post anything there. So you should be accurate with what you see on wikipedia.

Yes, millions of womens raped by Soviet Army is a classy Neo-Nazi propaganda.
It is a) has no documental evidence, being pure fantasy of authors of this text b) those texts are so badly written - they largely contradict real historical facts and events.
Unlike what nazi forces did on eastern front, maradeur and violence against civil population was rare and strictly prohibited in Soviet Army up to the martial law.

you believe it?
that text is in : https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cr%C3%ADmenes_de_guerra_del_Ej%C3%A9rcito_Rojo