Store Page
Cities: Skylines
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

Cities: Skylines

Store Page
Cities: Skylines >  Workshop > ninjapadda's Workshop
112 ratings
Forsmark reactor nr: 3
Description Discussions0 Comments7 Change Notes
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Assets: Building, Electricity
File Size
Posted
11.000 MB
19 Dec, 2015 @ 4:17pm
1 Change Note ( view )
Created by
ninjapadda
Offline
See all 1056 collections (some may be hidden)
12,740 Unique Visitors
5,891 Current Subscribers
355 Current Favorites

Subscribe to download
Forsmark reactor nr: 3

Description
Forsmark3.1 by ehrlund:

This is the last nuclear power reactor of a total of three, representing Forsmarks all reactors in Sweden.

(The 3.1 is just because of a minor tweak.)

Because CS keeps crashing when I try to open the model in the asset editor to find out the data, this is this the only info about the building I got at the moment:

Plot Sizes: Reactor 1 & 2: 12x13 Reactor 3: 8x16 I think, gotta check this one up to...


Up Keep: 300 / week
Power Out put: 900 MW

This being the latest and most efficient reactor of the three.

I think reactor 1 and 2 have basically the same specks as the in game Power Plant. You should obviously build them in the correct order as well. Reactor 1, Reactor 2 and last Reactor 3 :)

Reactor: 1
http://gtm.you1.cn/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=579355760
Reactor: 2
http://gtm.you1.cn/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=579350450
7 Comments
< >
YOYO 14 Sep, 2022 @ 2:12am 
The asset is beautiful, but why can't the fence be removed? Because of the fence, it is difficult to make the overall shape and layout. Too many fence makes the power plant ugly. Hope the author updates the asset so that the fence can be removed.
simson 14 Jul, 2020 @ 1:39am 
I was looking for a Barsebäck for a nice Øresund area but this is a good substitute.
Phillipzu 19 Jul, 2019 @ 8:51am 
Fits well in the Soviet NPP collection:
https://gtm.you1.cn/workshop/filedetails/?id=1808642059
Keep up the good work! :D
norlin.martin 4 Jul, 2016 @ 3:18pm 
I uesd to live near that thing. Thanks!
Casgar 24 Dec, 2015 @ 10:55am 
Just some suggestions, I think you should increase the weekly cost by quite abit. 300-500/week sound way too low imo. A x20 increase in the weekly cost would still be relatively cheep cost per MW.

Regarding the power output, have you chosen the numbers based on anything special? The actual outputs from the real reactors varies somewhere around 1000-1200 MW each, with Reactor 1 being the "smallest" as of right now.
Captain-No 19 Dec, 2015 @ 5:54pm 
fit well in the -Scandinavian- all in one Collection:
http://gtm.you1.cn/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=513137131
thank you, Thumbs up
Blackdragonbird 19 Dec, 2015 @ 5:09pm 
Can you please give more data? Each piece power output, water consumption, upkeep, build costs, plot size. And them the stats of the whole strutucture put togheter.

You can also create a collection with the 3 pieces to make easy to subscribe to all of them at once.

=)