安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
Bedfordshire, United Kingdom (Great Britain) 
Regarding AoE II the answer is YES but the matter of AoE III can not be determined until I play a game or two, sometime after October 15th. The original AoE III was different from AoE II. I first played AoE III when it was only on CDs and still have those.
The Treaty part was real goofy in performance. The Figures (Villagers and Such) were slightly better than AoE II and there was many new things in it. I enjoyed the "Field Hospital" with its two "Surgeons". A tent and when a wounded figure got close enough it began to heal. Animals had to "Fatten". You could choose which ones you wanted to play against but for New Players it is better to fight just one enemy, in AoE III.
On the matter of AoE II. My Standard game is against 7 enemies and I do play Easy difficulty,
Does that help?
ms_rachel_m_52 :)