6 people found this review helpful
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 1,237.7 hrs on record (305.8 hrs at review time)
Posted: 7 Sep, 2016 @ 7:24am
Updated: 7 Sep, 2016 @ 7:29am

Early Access Review
First of all, I want to say that the actual base game is really good. I have spent around 300 hours in it already playing on just one server/map and there is still plenty more stuff for me to do. The game also has lovely looking graphics and some amazing scenery. The game has also been fairly regularly updated with fixes, optimisations and additional features/content and hopefully this will continue since the last update.

Now, on to my mixed part of the review which is about the performance. The performance of the game sucks. I am running a 5930K, 32GB of 2666MHz memory I believe and a titan X on an Intel 750 NVME SSD and the game still stutters even when playing at 1080P with reduced settings. Personally I find that large player made structures cause most of the problems for me personally. The official ARK servers also suffer from some performance issues as well. This is however understandable as this is an early access game.
Now, onto my real issue with this game which is DLC. PAID DLC. I personally don't mind DLC being released after a game has been completed as bonus content however, releasing DLC before the actual base game is completed is just unbelievable. Next time, finishing your game that people have PAID for before releasing more content you expect people to pay even more for.
My concern is that we could have players bringing DLC items into a world which other players cannot get without buying the DLC making ARK slightly less fair and also introducing a pay to win system......
I also fear that this DLC will take away additional development time away from the base game as developers will start patching this DLC as well resulting in less fixes and updates for a game that isn't even finished yet.

early access seems like a great idea but it is just being abused by everyone know. Even developers that until this update I thought I could trust.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 Comments
the terminator 14 Mar, 2020 @ 11:35am 
Hi CupDuece
Wow. This is a blast from the past :)

I think you have your titan's mixed up
I had the Maxell titan released back in 2015.
The Titan X (Pascal) had only just been released in 2016 when this review was posted along with the GTX 1080.

The architecture of 10 series card allowed the 70 and 80 cards to outperform the 9th gen cards with this lead expanding with the release of the "ti" series cards. A card that is still very good to this day.
Thanks to what I believe were more aggressive clocks power limits and cooling the 1080 and 1080ti have been able to outperform the titan X Pascal and the titan Xp on average.
Titan and Quadro cards make no sense for gaming unless you also use programs that benefit from these cards but tend to perform close to their HTX counterpart.
Thanks, Scott
PS. I am legitimately curious to hear more about this 6GPU in 1U thing if you can? I can't imagine using anything smaller then a 2U chassis. Were most of the parts bespoke or of the shelf?