DEAD MEAT 最近的評論

If you have the base game, you gotta' have this DLC. It adds the ability to add these two predators on any map, even the first one you unlock, if you want. It also lets you set the scarcity of them. I.E. - rare to common. It's a great way to get some fast in-game coin (Gems) to rank up your gear ETC. Because you don't need to buy an in-game licence to shot them.
You'll probably just die until you rank up a bit.
But you can always just do some non-threatening hunts in the beginning, but what's the fun in that.
After playing with the DLC, I would not own the game without it.

Some funny death annotations would be a good addition to the game.

This is basically the same game as "Carnivores: Dinosaur Hunt REBORN" [(2015) I know it makes no sense, the naming of them], with better graphics. It gets a lot of negative reviews but to be honest it's pretty much the exact same game with different, improved in my opinion, key mapping. I liked the "Reborn" version, and I'm liking this one too. It goes on sale for less than $10 bucks US (with the DLC included) and for the life of me I don't understand all the negativity. The DLC adds the ability to add the two predators on any map, even the first one, you unlock. You can set the scarcity of them also. (I.E. rare - common). I think it adds a lot to the game. You can go out and hunt the first map doing easy non threatening hunts, or add a predator and bag them without the in-game licence required if they attack you for some in-game coin to buy upgrades to your equipment.
It's a good rainy day game, but you'll end up killing a mess of Dino's just ranking up to the basic maps and stuff. Somewhere around 6 hours and a few hundred dead Dino's the game had lost it's charm, and I still had not even unlocked any of the cool stuff.

This can be a little confusing ...
The game Carnivores: Dinosaur Hunt Reborn IS the older version from 2015.
It is no longer for sale on STEAM. That's because there is a newer version ...
Carnivores Dinosaur Hunt (2022)

I got this some time ago, but never got around to playing it. It's a pretty good game now that I am. I just wish the players character could run faster in-game .... if you get my drift.

P.S.
If you're really brave ... you can use tranquilizer darts on them, you don't have to kill them.
Being able to run REALLY FAST should be in the game.

A Big time YES ...
The REAL McCOY
One of the greatest Combat Flight Simulations ever made.

If you are asking yourself, how does this guy like a game that won't run on WIN 10 the way STEAM sells it? I'll tell you a simple way to make a lot of these old games run.
BEFORE you launch the game do this ...
1) Disable the STEAM overlay and cloud.
2) Then make a folder anyplace where you want the install.
3) Then just go into the steam library and move the whole game over to that folder.
4) Then make a shortcut to the games EXE file.
BINGO
Run it from there.
Just like the old days when you bought the stuff on CD and physically installed something.

1946 is 10 times the game that the newer IL2's are.
I've flown this game for thousands of hours.
Get IL2 Stalingrad if you must, don't feel bad they suckered me too, you'll come back to this. Most players seeking anything close to an aerial combat simulation do. Stalingrad is just a big time rip off way to sell over priced Planes.
Stalingrad is like Microsoft Flight SIM with some pitiful Guns pasted on em'
The freakin' tutorials are for ... Aerobatics.
Yeah, that right there is your sign.
Fur-balls need not apply.
Not a problem in IL2 1946.

I've flown just about every flight sim there is ... just don't, the game sucks.
I had tens of thousands of hours flying JANEs Fighter Anthology. JANEs F/A-18, Falcon 4.0, IL2 before there ever even was a STEAM.
There is no Toggle anything. No toggle Cockpit for example.
There is no "next" anything to padlock next target and jump from target to target to achieve situational awareness.
It's totally stupid. Your not in a real world aircraft, you are looking at a 2 dimensional screen in a 3d rendered environment. There's no way to achieve situational awareness. They can say its a sim, but its not its just a way to sell over priced planes. They should all go work on Windows 12, since they are trying to sell the concept that removing features is actually more. Anybody that wants to play hardcore does not have to use the commonly accepted features that make a Flight Sim. approachable, usable, FUN, to a wider audience. It's basically like a Microsoft Flight sim with almost useless guns. Check out the online tutorials and it's how to do aerobatics ... that should tell you all you need to know.
The original IL2 was a great simulation one of the greatest of all time... this is nothing but a rip off plain and simple ... just don't. It's not a combat sim at all, it's just flying around looking at pretty crap. No furballs here.

I have to give this Shooter a big thumbs up. A big part of Shooters are the Guns, and in this game they take a unique approach to making them central to the action. This is a colorful entertaining shooter that dares to be different. But don't let the appearance fool you, it's a shooter, a seriously fast paced shooter. This game is all about movement and rapid in-game command utilization. At my age it was beyond my capabilities, it is best played with a game controller, this is no mouse and keyboard shooter (at least for me). But even with that said I have to give the creators their due. I tip my hat to them.
I highly recommend giving this game a try.
You will know if it's something you will be able to master well within the STEAM 2 hour refund limit when you take on the first "easy" Boss Battle. It may look like a kind of silly colorful game, but it is not, it is a shooter to its core it tries to be nothing else. Players throw around the term "skill" when talking about games, this game requires them. The commands are few, the action is simple but it's in your face from start to finish and it's a real work out for a real gamer.
Another big plus for the game is how slick it runs. I ran it on an off the shelf plain-Jane gamer with an 3060RTX@8g, 16g RAM, and an AMD@3.7 and it looked great and ran smooth as butter.

A few years ago I'd a beat this thing.
It beat me, and won my respect along the way.
I'd give it two thumps up if I could ... and it handed me my hat.

The Guns rock, the combat in general is fun.
I had originally gave this game a negative review mostly because of technical issues.
After the most recent patch my opinion has changed.
I'm still not the biggest fan of the Boss Battle at the end, seems kinda' 2000' to me. But the World and Weapons are interesting and fun.
Do yourself a favor and go watch a You Tube video and get that talking Pistol right from the start and KEEP it.
I would recommend this game now, how could I not, I got about 100 hours in it so there's something there I like.

Recommended ... with a caveat.

*** caveat /kăv′ē-ät″, kä′vē-, kā′vē-ăt″/
noun
A warning or caution.
"made a recommendation with many caveats."
A qualification or explanation ***

My favorite simulation to date has been JANEs F/A-18.
This DCS F/A-18 and the DCS simulation in general falls far short in comparison in overall combat experience. Not even close. The hours most Players spend playing it proves that.
I Bought the F/A-18 and the Persian Gulf Campaign, the Super Carrier, and the Persian Gulf Terrain in the hopes of recreating that simulation. This is a very good training simulation, not so much a combat game, and a simulation IS a type of PC game. The VAST majority of players that buy it do so to simulate aerial combat / ground attacks, not prepare to actually fly an F/A-18 in real life. After a few hundred hours with this you could probably start up and fly the real thing. The Flight models feel spot on, the Terrains are beautiful and probably reproductions of the actual world, with plenty of landmarks and elevation changes to fly in and around. All that being said, it does not accommodate the non hardcore simulation players hardly at all if any. And that is a shame. The learning cure is very steep even for experienced simulation pilots. And it's not so much a learning curve as many of us know the F/A-18 by heart, it's adapting their command scheme to a HOTAS that is usable in fast paced action.

In order to get one campaign for the F/A-18 you will need to buy the Jet, The Super-Carrier, The Persian Gulf, and the Campaign itself. That's over $100 bucks, WELL OVER, even on sale.
WHICH WOULD BE OK IF IT ENDS UP BEING SOMETHING YOU WILL USE, MANY WILL NOT. THE VAST MAJORITY OF PLAYERS DO NOT.
You get one or two enemy aircraft, not to fly, to set on the Tarmac and fiddle with the cockpit ??? WTF. The game is very limited in the experiences it offers. It in no way comes close to the cyber combat experience offered in JANEs F/A-18, Falcon 4, or IL2 (1946 not the Stalingrad, it's a Plane Rip-Off just like this) for anybody but those wanting a pure simulation ... not even close. Which again, is a shame because with just a few accommodations with the key mapping options it could be much more usable by many more players. For me there will be many hours involved trying to get a good HOTAS set up that is anything like the HOTAS setup I run in other sims. It makes no accommodations for the fact that your not in a real Jet. You have the limitations of the HOTAS you are using (and I have a kick ass VKB) and that you are looking at a 2D screen that is creating a 3D world with you in it. Situational awareness is not as good as some sims that use the typical commands that are some what standard across all sims.

You will play it and try to conform to THEIR limited ideals of what a simulation should be. After buying it and trying it almost to a player most just set it aside and end up logging very limited hours. Don't believe me, go ahead and look at some of the players on your STEAM friends list that own it and notice the hours spent running it. That could be easily remedied with just a few minor changes in just the available commands to map, and still leave the pure simulations ones for the hardcore fans. Why not cater to both? They don't know the meaning of the words TOGGLE or NEXT, don't they know what "NO COCKPIT" MEANS? After I removed the displays from the HUD only view the game became tolerable.

*here is how to removed the DDI's from the virtual Cockpit View (their terminology) *

To remove the left and right DDI and AMPCD but keep the HUD on FA-18C

edit file ...
[dcs install]\Mods\aircraft\FA-18C\Cockpit\Scripts\Multipurpose_Display_Group\Common\indicator\BAKE\MPD_common_bake_init.lua

change this line

"purposes = render_purposes_to_use or {render_purpose.GENERAL, render_purpose.HUD_ONLY_VIEW}"

to

"purposes = render_purposes_to_use or {render_purpose.GENERAL}"

A simple thing like tabbing out of the game to access other programs will require a work-around. Any kind of quality of life update is unheard of because they are still working on the overpriced "finished product" they gouge players for.
You might spend a hundred hours trying to come up with a workable HOTAS profile just to play a few hours and realize they did not even give you a decent way to save the thing. You can go right now in the free version / settings / controls, make a few changes and try and click "save profile as" upper right and see if I'm joking. You will probably have to go into your saved games and manually backup your profiles. Because until you figure out that you must first select and highlight a command within the spread sheet, just any one of the commands, the option is not available. It's been like that from the start I guess, could be fixed.

You don't have to ruin a hardcore simulation to also make it a timeless game.
If I had to choose between this and JANEs F/A-18, I'd say this could as should have been BETTER than JANEs F/A-18 in EVERY way, but it's only a better training simulation, no where near as good of combat game. It should and could have been both.
DCS is a good training scenario simulator, it offers such a limited experience that it can't compare in most cases to a more complete dynamic game like Falcon 4.0 or JANEs F/A-18 in all out combat action. If I had it to do over again I'd start out with the F-86 in the hopes that DCS does a better job with a less complicated Plane. Plain and simple a simulation that requires "Active Pause" during combat has a flawed key mapping scheme. There is a time and place for a pure training simulation, and there is a time and place for considerations to be made to accommodate for the fact that you are playing a computer game, not sitting in the real thing. The creators of this DCS F/A-18 are not "Purist" they are just SLACKERS. It is a niche incomplete product that uses predatory marketing techniques and hype to generate sales.

I want to end up this review by pointing out the insane greed of the developers of the DCS content and recommend you click the "All DLC" for this game option and scroll down to the bottom of that list ... just look at that number, not on sale it's over 3K. Most would never need all of that but I personally know of people that have over $700 invested in this software.

I find it difficult to support any more of their efforts and purchase any more of their work, and instead return to Falcon 4.0 BMS, or Strike Fighters 2 and prefer the community made content for those. I also prefer to support the community made efforts for this abomination available at ...

CombatAce.com

Just like Mass Effect some fool screwed this game up with the stupid puzzles.
It's to that degree.
They detract from the game big-time.

This is one damn good campaign.

Period.