And why would I concern myself with people the likes of you, and that unapologetic, Japanophillic coomer? Is your public education system so predictably lustreless — so damnably handicapping — that it escapes the imagination that certain content and rhetoric might not always be exoteric? I merely do not suffer the lame and artless as much as the average person (and rightly so). To be specific, I think of people like you as homunculi — degenerate on a genetic and cognitive level — unable to understand the beauty of communication and technology hence your repeated misunderstanding and perversion of that beauty for your own puke-inducing justifications.

I feel like you missed what I'm saying, I'm not saying the government should delete your account, just maybe people would actually care what you have to say if you toned down the trickle down economics and stop talking about how people online are anonymous. You sound like you've been spending too much time with the weird uncle, I'm not canceling you, just pull yourself up by your bootstraps, grow a spine, and stop bringing up your philosophical inspirations.

As aforementioned, freedom of speech is a worthwhile value to be exercised and I will not hesitate to respond accordingly offline and online to such exercises; I believe these activities to be key in cognitive discourse and civil society as a whole.

@Plempy

Perhaps if you took the time to check the profile of @エロ音声作品学者, and even go as far as translating their name, you will understand my witty remark as having reason to it. You can disparage me for reading some of Sigmund Freud's work and incorporating it into my understanding of psychology. Nonetheless, it allows me to understand how candid and unconscious people become when in a safe/comforting environment - wherein they can truly illustrate themselves intentionally or unintentionally without having to fear judgment on their *actual names* by family, peers, friends, strangers, etc.

The key point is, never to forget that the Internet is supported primarily by real people with real emotions that are often emboldened and open as per one of the many consequences of anonymity in mixture with the feeling of community.

The achievements are non-issue; think of their artificial 100% completion as me giving it up completely after I have said all I needed to say. Why an individual would pry further and make something of virtual achievements significant is questionable, but for the sake of being polite, I will go no further than that.

This is the Internet, where anonymity and lack of restraint are both commonplace and perhaps par for the course — which pretty much answers your first question. For your non-question, I try to be as genuine as possible so as to demonstrate there is someone real and critical on the other side of the screen rather than some no-name/John Doe leaving some generic positive or negative remark on the products they review on Steam's platform. I also allow comments to be enabled to allow others to criticize my criticisms so as to communicate respect for discourse, irrespective of its level of relevancy and coherence, as it is the first constitutional right in the United States and more than worthy of demonstrating publically and privately.