Upd2: I disagree with the new community guideline policy.

Upd: Situation with weapon balance improved significantly.

In evaluating this game, I find it imperative to recommend it wholeheartedly, as it soars well above its counterparts such as COD or Battlefield, easily outshining them in multiple aspects. The competition simply pales in comparison, unable to measure up to its current standard.

However, the game does harbor a plethora of areas that demand attention and refinement:

- One noticeable concern lies in the stark advantage wielded by SMGs, which seem to outclass their competitors across an expansive range of engagement. While it's only reasonable for SMGs to excel at close quarters, they appear to outperform even ARs at longer distances, a phenomenon that extends beyond my personal experience. Remarkably, this sentiment resonates with the wider community, including adept marksmen within my circle of friends.
- An aspect that continues to bewilder is the inadequate penetrative mechanics. Regardless of the firepower a player commands, the bullets steadfastly refuse to traverse through seemingly permeable barriers like thin fences. Puzzlingly, this conundrum persists even in the wake of the 2.0.0 update. One can only speculate about the developers' underlying rationale – perhaps a conceptual perspective or more pressing priorities preclude the resolution of this matter. The enigma persists.

I must confess that I find myself withholding from indulging in the game until these issues receive the attention they merit. My personal predilection for adopting the role of a medium-range rifleman equipped with potent ballistics fuels this desire for refinement, a playstyle I am deeply fond of. It remains my sincere hope that the development team recognizes and addresses these concerns, allowing the game to realize its potential and cater to a broader array of strategic inclinations. In my desired subjective view.

[h1]A Game of Tremendous Potential[/h1] Upd2: I disagree with the new community guideline policy. Upd: Situation with weapon balance improved significantly. In evaluating this game, I find it imperative to recommend it wholeheartedly, as it soars well above its counterparts such as COD or Battlefield, easily outshining them in multiple aspects. The competition simply pales in comparison, unable to measure up to its current standard. However, the game does harbor a plethora of areas that demand attention and refinement: - One noticeable concern lies in the stark advantage wielded by SMGs, which seem to outclass their competitors across an expansive range of engagement. While it's only reasonable for SMGs to excel at close quarters, they appear to outperform even ARs at longer distances, a phenomenon that extends beyond my personal experience. Remarkably, this sentiment resonates with the wider community, including adept marksmen within my circle of friends. - An aspect that continues to bewilder is the inadequate penetrative mechanics. Regardless of the firepower a player commands, the bullets steadfastly refuse to traverse through seemingly permeable barriers like thin fences. Puzzlingly, this conundrum persists even in the wake of the 2.0.0 update. One can only speculate about the developers' underlying rationale – perhaps a conceptual perspective or more pressing priorities preclude the resolution of this matter. The enigma persists. I must confess that I find myself withholding from indulging in the game until these issues receive the attention they merit. My personal predilection for adopting the role of a medium-range rifleman equipped with potent ballistics fuels this desire for refinement, a playstyle I am deeply fond of. It remains my sincere hope that the development team recognizes and addresses these concerns, allowing the game to realize its potential and cater to a broader array of strategic inclinations. In my desired subjective view.