8 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
2
3
Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 0.0 hrs on record
Posted: 11 Nov, 2023 @ 12:02pm
Updated: 11 Nov, 2023 @ 12:08pm

I dont see why all the negativity. I think the open world missions are an interesting idea and something different for the call of duty series its something we've never seen. I look at it as the devs trying something new. Lets all be honest they've went all over the place with the series for the last 20 something years start with WW2 then Modern Day then Futuristic then back to WW1 and 2 then back to Modern times again lol. I mean come on guys there trying something new with the game and I respect that I think we should all look at it that way and be open minded and give it a chance.

Although by far to be honest at the very bottom of a tier list for COD Campaigns sadly but its still fun and still has those great Cinematic Cutscenes that are Photo Realistic. Despite people saying Zombies is just Battle Royale with Zombies its really not its almost like an entire new mode its very fun and very addicting. I do agree that its basically a huge Expansion rather than a new game but I think thats what its intended to be.

Pro's

*Remastered MW2 (2009) Maps Look Amazing

*Zombies

*New Weapons

*Loadout System Overhaul

*New UI

*Updated Soundscape

*AMAZING 10/10 Graphic's

*Props to devs for exploring new ideas for the series with the open combat missions


Con's

*Very Buggy, Just- yeah bugs EVERYWHERE but its a new game give the devs time to buff them out.
*Shuttering
*Weird Jagged Graphic Glitches
*While the idea for an open world campaign is interesting its honestly one of the worst COD Campaigns but its fun if you make the most of it and focus on the story.
*The Amount of Disk Space takes this game back to 2019. The disk Space Requirements are Absurd.
*70$ Price Tag.
*Probably more im missings.



In Conclusion While this "Expansion" Does bring new features and maps its still MW2 at its best. Not saying its bad its really fun. Its just a very expensive Expansion pack. As with new releases it comes with a TON of bugs but its not even been out a week yet. I'll come back to this review in 3 months with an Update then another at 6 and finally one at year 1. The campaign is horrible but again if you focus on just the story it can be fun. The open world idea is innovative but I think they need to look at some AAA Open World games and what made them successful if there wanting to take COD into Open World Territory. The maps are Open Combat and that fits the description perfectly. Its not truly open world but its also not linear its in between like Simi Open World/ SImi Linear if that makes any sense. Zombies is ALOT of fun and very addicting its not DMZ with Zombies its completely different and very fun.

Finally I think IGN's Review of 4/10 is accurate and I have to agree but im gonna bump mine up a little to 5/10. Watch for sales and catch this expansion when its on sale its not worth the 70$ im just a die hard life long COD Fan that couldnt help but to buy it and see what it was. Im definitely going to continue playing it because I like it however my Review and rating for now still Stands.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
4 Comments
Mystic_Megan [PC] [US] 11 Nov, 2023 @ 3:33pm 
@~~ Thank You 🙂
Mystic_Megan [PC] [US] 11 Nov, 2023 @ 3:33pm 
@curly_nuts however you wanna say it lol
~~ 11 Nov, 2023 @ 1:54pm 
I guess there is some fun in reaching for emotional engagement with your audience by insisting the absolute worst has regularly arrived with each fresh iteration of whatever comes under consideration. But the vitriol and hyperbole gets tired as does continual sycophantic worship aimed at securing material gain or access to important individuals. Nestled between the perpetually outraged vocal minority and the silent majority are some precious vistas of reasoned analysis that benefit from critical thinking, historical context, and tentative optimism. This is one such vista.
curly_nuts 11 Nov, 2023 @ 1:09pm 
shuttering or stuttering?