Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
or maybe a revamp of the review system. One where you have a summary or just a small part of the review displayed on the Store page, and where you can read the rest of the review as well.
Currently the word "Review" is a bit--- deceiving.
I think the goal of the current review system is to Advise Players on whether or not they should or shouldn't buy it (or if you have no opinion on this)
So "Advise" would be better as such. But you do decided to call it a review.
Lots of games contain a lot of ... bloat basically, too many features. Do they all work properly? There is too little space to explain what happens when you interact with these even when you try to keep it short.
maybe, but most wont even use 1k, because most people dont spend much time browsing and reading other comments, or trying to find accurate analysis.
but you could make a video, and leaver the link after a short description or few introductory comments
more detailed reviews could be encouraged if the "social platform aspect" of steam was also encouraged through points and meritocratic moderation powers similar to what used to be done in newgroundsDOTcom (i ignora any recent changes because i havent checked their site recently).
also, if a stickers were allowed to be used (with a very small daily limit of uses; ie n amount of stickers n times, like a total of 3 times the same sticker, or 3 different stickers, per forum per day). threads would be more interesting visually; maybe also allow video thumbnails for any "video links". something similar could also be interesting for reviews, from people that have proven to be able to make good use (ie havent been confirmed as spammers or pranksters). then, an increase limit of characters could also be a meritocratic option (to prevent abuse).
They are reviews, but is true most are "bad", not as in negative, but in the sense of "poorly written".
the section is named "reviews" because that is the intended use, and most users understand that. that doesnt mean everyone will care to make good reviews ("properly written"), or be able to communicate effectively something useful.
thats why i think such feature could exist as a "meritocratic option", after earning the "score" points from their activity in forums, like giving advice or support, or participating (even ranting) without insulting or acting very aggressively against other users, etc.
that way the feature could become appealing for video reviewers and people more involved in doing better, more accurate and entertaining reviews, in and outside steam.
and just because you would skip a long review doesn't mean it isn't helpful to others