安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
On the topic, the game takes itself fairly seriously overall. It's not a dull sandbox with no reward for skill. The core game economics are good especially compared to competing titles that I am able to ignore it's shortfalls.
What you will find with most similar titles is that skill doesn't matter and there is such an overwhelming amount of possibilities that players who stick with the game retreat into a "system of play" where they have a "blue-print" of their preferred signalling/dispatching/junction or station layouts etc.. Perhaps this is the only way to play those games and remain sane. If we actually were to play those games we quickly get overwhelmed with a rat's nest of rail and the resulting tangled web of connection. Thankfully this game is not that. Volumes are moderate and the requirements to grow a city are not complex, so you can do a lot with simple layouts and routes.
whole point of management game is manage under stress
You maybe looking for some sandbox "stupid" mode, where you can mindlessly build, that can be added to game easly by devs