I still think this game is better than Breakpoint

Far From Perfect, But Impossible to Put Down

If “action-packed sandbox shooter with a hint of Far Cry DNA” makes your ears perk up, Ghost Recon Wildlands might just be your cup of tea. It doesn't aim to be a masterpiece, but it’s got a certain charm that might keep you hooked for hours on end. Here’s my take:

First Impressions
From the get-go, Wildlands can feel like a “dumbed down Far Cry,” loaded with explosions and frenetic encounters. Unfortunately, the plot itself doesn’t match the bombast of the action: there’s a noticeable shortage of cutscenes, and the sub-villains never really get fleshed out. The main antagonist stands out, but everyone else seems to blur together, making each major moment feel fleeting and a bit shallow.

Characters & Dialogue
Your squad might look ready for anything, but their collective personality doesn’t go much further than a handful of voice lines – repeated ad nauseam. Lacking backstories also strip them of depth, which is a real shame, as some more character development and banter could’ve made the story much more immersive.

Gameplay Loop
The core gameplay loop remains undeniably satisfying. Even if there aren’t a ton of mission types, the gunplay feels smooth, and stealth takedowns are fun enough to keep you invested. Unfortunately, from the start, you have access to one of the most versatile weapons in the game, so there’s little reason to experiment with the vast armory. A greater incentive to use and master new weapons would’ve given the game more longevity.

Tier One Mode
Tier One mode is an intriguing concept but jumps in difficulty drastically – you go from story mode to an unforgiving extreme difficulty way too early. Reaching rank 20 is already tough, and beyond that, it feels like you’re just getting knocked out faster without a nuanced increase in difficulty. More stats, more balancing, and a gentler yet still challenging curve would’ve gone a long way here.

Where It Shines
Despite the weak narrative and shallow squadmates, there’s something inherently “comfortable” about playing Wildlands. The setting, the gunplay, and the open-world exploration all blend into a reliable experience that players seem to return to, even if it’s not revolutionary. It’s an excellent title to fire up for a few missions, blow off some steam, and then come back to whenever you’re craving more.

Where It Could Improve
Imagine if it had an extra year of development:

Radio Variety & Interactivity: More channels, more chatter, more life in the world.
Deeper Stats & Visuals: Detailed breakdowns of weapons, vehicles, and regions.
Interconnected Story: Stronger links between sub-villains, with real consequences for your actions in each region.
Dynamic Control: A power tug-of-war among the cartel, Unidad, and rebels.
Enhanced Enemy Dialogue: More situational lines, especially when sneaking around.
Vehicle Challenges & Collectibles: Logging each variant in a collection, stats included, plus improved summoning so vehicles don’t spawn 400 meters away.
Scores
Story: 5.5/10
Barebones plot, lacks punchy moments.
Gameplay: 8/10
Satisfying loop, fun gunplay, though a bit repetitive.
Depth: 5/10
High potential, not enough fleshed-out content.
Replayability: 7/10
Not a ton of variety, but easy to pick up again later.
Mechanics: 6.5/10
Feels smooth overall, some rough edges.
Fun: 8/10
Consistently entertaining despite its flaws.
Final Word
It’s safe to say Ghost Recon Wildlands isn’t a technical marvel or a boundary-pushing epic. But if you’re after an easygoing shooter with a massive sandbox to explore, it still has its appeal. Sometimes, simple can be good – and Wildlands manages to prove that point nicely, even if you’re left wishing for a little more depth and polish.

Overall: 7/10
but a GOOD 7/10 that you won't regret.

Have a new PC with windows 11, game wont launch.

Atleast if you buy it you can refund it under 2 hours of game time. I'm SOL unless I hook up my old pc.