Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Maybe roads of power added Rome to list so Byz emperor can take Rome by decision if it is owned by emperors vassal.
I'm not sure how this interacts with Feudal inheritence, as you were attempting, but I suspect "not well" is the answer, given the evidence you have provided.
THE
EMPEROR
CONQUER
THE
MAP
CRUSH
ALL
DISSENT
The top title is Catepanate, which is greek kingdom tier. I have a kingdom within the Byz that contains Latium, Tuscany, Spoleto, Diyarrabia, Hellennia and parts of Thessali. Shouldn't the top title of Kingdom then transfer it all, with vassals, to my son?
He is a "Tourmarches" not a full strategos. Does that count? I can't force him to step down and he does inherit almost everything else. It's just the duchy of Latium that the Emperor takes.