@knighter if that's plagiarism all art is plaigarism.

Nothing wrong with ai art unless it's used for commercial purposes as long as it's stated that the artwork is made by ai (OP, state that ai work is ai work in the future)

Pretty neat

@hoppkids you described plagiarism lmao, it takes a bunch of actual human art made by humans with human feelings and then recycles it into a feelingless blob of randomly generated lines and colors.
by the way, plenty of gamers produce good art and then post it on steam.

nice^^

nothing wrong with ai art, as long as it's good

I mean, this guy inputted a prompt for AI and got something cool he wanted to share. What did he do wrong?

If its AI its no less valid than person made as a general principle. As a fine art it's less valid since nobody made it with an intension but its an average of all the input images so its like a team working on a book or something. so really its not a computer making stuff up, its a collaboration of a lot of people where all of them ACTUALLY have a say. A team has a head most of the time so really the head makes main decisions. And i doubt people should be looking on a game community for fine art. You don't probably think of a TV show as an art yet it is. Just not necessarially good art.

bot art

AI garbo :(