安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
If you just give attack orders to a whole tank platoon, it usually ends in disaster, with tanks turning their flanks to enemy guns and just generally driving into ditches and getting stuck in mud and trenches.
Another example of micromanaging is to keep your flamethrower guys away from the rest of the platoon so they don't burn their friends to a crisp.
And of course making sure your mortar platoon commander moves to the right place to see without being seen.
And manually choosing and shifting targets for your howitzers for direct observed fire. You can let them choose their own targets, but I find it's much more effective putting down a target marker yourself.
One thing I disagree about t hough is that you say people shouldn't micromanage and that the effects are unsatisfactory. I know there are different opinions on this, but my take is that you actually need to micromanage quite a lot in this game. At least if you play it as a game that you wnt to win, and not just to look at the game playing itself.