Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Example of dust: https://ibb.co/gvZn7CJ
Example of an intentional colour change (in this case, Necromancer): https://ibb.co/0KhRfXn
Also, some war paints *intentionally* change the colour of the scope - for example, Necromancer and Business Class make it a satisfying shade of brown. :3
Question: when you are ranking rarest to common, you put that it goes FT > WW > BS. Is there a reason you listed it that way?
I assume it’s because blood splatters are less common on FT. But if that is the case, what about the wear’s rarity itself?
It may be more likely to find blood on the scope on a BS compared to a FT, but there are far more FT skins that exist than BS skins that exist (FT being the most common wear at around 30% and BS being the least common wear at around 8%). Could an argument be made that blood scope rarity is equal regardless of wear? Or maybe that BS or even WW Blood Scopes are rarer than FT?
I suppose since we don’t know the % odds for bloodscopes we can truly never be sure, but I am curious if you have insights to share.
Thanks for making the guide!