Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
One minor 'mistake', Base of the Boomdakka Snasswagon seems disformed (bigger and rounder).
Still playable though And i thank you for the work you put in this.
Sincerely, A fellow 40K Hobbyist
But If you were to try taking your own pictures and scans I would def suggest taking it at a single angle 360" with atleast 48 pictures. you'll have the best success that way.
additionally agisoft offers a limited time trail for both their versions.
It becomes more important when it comes to more complex shapes like a castellan robot for example. Those are 4 angles x 12 pictures so it becomes alot harder for the software to recognize which angles are where in relation to a 3d model. You'll get a jumble mess if you run the program with just type of particular cases.
the markers basically helps identify the ups/down left and rights of the model so it has a point of reference when scanning.