安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I found X-Com 2 much more difficult, much more pressure on time, both tactically and strategically and has a very annoying rng.
Battlemech requires a lot of grind through the campaign, the little difficulty skulls are warnings - ignore them and you get quickly swamped. When you are comfortable with the technical aspects of the game and are on your way to building a heavier lance of stompy mechs, you can take on missions with equal tonnage/difficulty rating.
There's no time limit that I can see to complete the campaign, unlike X-Com. The tactical aspect does have similarities; you have to use cover to survive, there's no overwatch, but you can defer turns to later in the round.
And once in the mid-campaign, morale and called shots/vigilance are essential in taking down the enemy.