Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
I found X-Com 2 much more difficult, much more pressure on time, both tactically and strategically and has a very annoying rng.
Battlemech requires a lot of grind through the campaign, the little difficulty skulls are warnings - ignore them and you get quickly swamped. When you are comfortable with the technical aspects of the game and are on your way to building a heavier lance of stompy mechs, you can take on missions with equal tonnage/difficulty rating.
There's no time limit that I can see to complete the campaign, unlike X-Com. The tactical aspect does have similarities; you have to use cover to survive, there's no overwatch, but you can defer turns to later in the round.
And once in the mid-campaign, morale and called shots/vigilance are essential in taking down the enemy.