11
已評論
產品
0
帳戶內
產品

Luckybuffalo 最近的評論

< 1  2 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 11 項
118 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
8 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 0.0 小時
Price of a full game to get new modifiers and text bubbles
張貼於 2024 年 5 月 12 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 992.5 小時 (評論時已進行 97.8 小時)
I love this game and I think, if you look at Vanilla Ck2 and vanilla CK3, CK3 is far better than Ck2 in vanilla, you can play anyone expect barons, churches and republics, but that still pretty good and better than Ck2 where you can only play as catholic nations in Ck2.You can also play at any time, Where in Ck2 you couldnt, you needed 3? or 2? DLC's to play at any time. So in Ck2 you would need 5 DLC's just to get the options in CK3 to play as any nation. This game also has way more features than Vanilla CK2 and more options, events and so on. Literally in Ck2 the only thing that you could do than was somewhat interesting was holding feasts. Vanilla Ck2 is far more boring than Vanilla Ck3. So i have no idea what people are on about how this game is worse than Ck2, obviously if you have all the DLC's in CK2 it will be better than CK3 because you spent over 300 dollars, but for a game worth 50 dollars you are getting most features from DLC CK2 in this game, i am very excited to see the DLC's for CK3 knowing that they won't just reskin DLC's from CK2. This game is already good in Vanilla and it will be far better with DLC's.
張貼於 2020 年 11 月 18 日。 最後編輯於 2020 年 11 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 1,425.7 小時 (評論時已進行 305.9 小時)
After the update this game looks better and sounds better. Before the update the engine sounded like bugs passing your ear and it was really annoying. The explosions and fire look so better now, Only drawback after this new update it the dead tanks don't despawn, witch blocks pathways and make it really hard to clear them because how slow it takes to move them, it you can even move them out of the way. But yea, i little grindy game but i don't care because it doesn't shove it down your face. You don't need the max tanks and max planes to have fun, it doesn't really matter to me, but i can see why people find this game gindy if they only want those things.
張貼於 2020 年 2 月 23 日。 最後編輯於 2020 年 11 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 2,723.3 小時 (評論時已進行 305.1 小時)
300 hours still never won a game
張貼於 2019 年 12 月 22 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 121.3 小時 (評論時已進行 99.9 小時)
good game but balancing is horrible your either on the team that gets ♥♥♥♥♥♥ on or on the team that wins in under 5 minutes
all your team could be under level 50 and your versing another team thats all above 400
張貼於 2019 年 7 月 1 日。 最後編輯於 2020 年 2 月 23 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 1,311.8 小時 (評論時已進行 593.4 小時)
CS:GO 評論
good i guess
張貼於 2019 年 6 月 14 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 13.7 小時 (評論時已進行 13.4 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
this game is absolute aweful now. They killed the only good BR game out there. Only good kit is Hook witch is super op and glider is horrible now. season 1 was better
張貼於 2019 年 1 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 38.9 小時 (評論時已進行 0.3 小時)
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ horrible, its so grindy and then also i had an account scince beta ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ beta but no I cant play it anymore cuz of gay ass steam ♥♥♥♥ steam ruins every ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game its so dumb that i cant play crossout without steam so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ dumb so i cant even ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ play the game anymore unless i want to spend 100 hours to get everything back. also they game is extremly pay to win honestly am suprised ea wasnt involved in this game super grindy if you dont want to pay 10$ a week to play the game. im fine with grindy games but crossout its so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ grindy have to spent 1 week just to get a free rare so stupid wouldnt recommend this game get robocraft instead.
張貼於 2018 年 7 月 23 日。 最後編輯於 2019 年 5 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 146.4 小時 (評論時已進行 2.0 小時)
its a good game i just wouldnt get it for 30 dollars
Dont get to many assests and mods though because them you can never play the game again. That sucks for me :(
張貼於 2018 年 7 月 12 日。 最後編輯於 2019 年 5 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 659.7 小時 (評論時已進行 638.7 小時)
this is a good game but it was better in 2017-2018.
張貼於 2017 年 7 月 1 日。 最後編輯於 2020 年 11 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 11 項