Look For the Lower Case 'L' And You
Will Be Kissed Tomorrow:
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLlLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLL
*Now Look For The Q And Your Wish
Will Come True:
... ... ... ... ... OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O.. .OOOOOOOO
*This Is Really Hard, Now Find The 'N':
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNMM
*Now Find The Mistake:
ABCDEFGHIJKLNMOPQRSTUVWQYZ
*Something You Really Want, After the
countdown!!!!!
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Now Close Your
Eyes And Make A Wish! ;*;*;*;*;*;* Now
Paste This On 9 pages And Your Wish
Will Come True! Hurry, You Have 20
minutes! Or What You Wished For Will
Be The Opposite

┈┈╱▏┈┈┈┈┈╱▔▔▔▔╲┈
┈┈▏▏┈┈┈┈┈▏╲▕▋▕▋▏
┈┈╲╲┈┈┈┈┈▏┈▏┈▔▔▔▆ ------- You thicc AF! Lemme slide up into them DM's!
┈┈┈╲▔▔▔▔▔╲╱┈╰┳┳┳╯
╱╲╱╲▏┈┈┈┈┈┈▕▔╰━╯
▔╲╲╱╱▔╱▔▔╲╲╲╲┈┈┈
┈┈╲╱╲╱┈┈┈┈╲╲▂╲▂┈
┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈╲╱╲╱┈

-rep Washington v. Texas (1967) is a US Supreme Court case about the right of criminal defendants to have witnesses testify on their behalf. The Court decided that the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution applied in state courts as well as federal courts. At his trial Jackie Washington had attempted to call his co-defendant as a witness but was blocked because state law prevented co-defendants from testifying for each other, under the theory that they might lie for each other on the stand. The Supreme Court reasoned that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment gives defendants the right to fair proceedings, including the right to compel defense witnesses to testify. In previous cases, the Supreme Court had ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment, which was adopted after the Civil War, makes many federal guarantees in the Bill of Rights applicable to the states. The impact of Washington was narrowed by a later case, Taylor v. Illinois

Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers
A peck of pickled peppers Peter Piper picked
If Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers
Where’s the peck of pickled peppers Peter Piper picked?

poopie