Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
The 3rd one -> No, that did not happen in my case at least, so I won't put it.
The 4th one -> That has no connections to this game, however I'd rather see some young developers taking a challenge than always the same developers to develop games.
As of "Bots and Replay", I have tried them on Call to Arms, and I have to object what you said, in my opinion they work pretty well and pretty efficient.
DMS does not suck, they do have some bad marketing strategies, such as selling the "remaster" of the original MoW game, and a pretty bad support, but they are not as bad as you say.
* No bots without buying DLC
* No replay without buying DLC
* Next to no online community with rampang ragequitting and kicking
* Soldiers: Arena and Gates of Hell coming out soon by different developers.
** Bots and Replay that you pay for are the laziest semi-functional implementations.
DMS sucks, never forget.
Great Job!