Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Using an in-house engine is very difficult for game studios, and using unreal has no effect on a development's teams choice to use pre-made assets or not, as that's something that is done in programs with no relation to game engines.
In-house engines are often difficult because on top of the development team having to update it while they work on the game itself, its often never written down on how to actually use it, only passed down through word of mouth. this means that when the oldest employees who made the engine leave, nobody is left that understands how to do things, which makes development take even longer because they have to figure it out on their own.
This is why unreal engine has been especially popular among studios lately. Everything is written down, which makes it far easier to learn how to use the engine, which makes development go months faster then with an in-house engine.