Ted Mosby 님이 최근에 작성한 평가

Its good for an RTS -- But it has its problems.

1. The match ending -- Once you've sent enough to nukes to your enemies it ends the game. "The world is in ruins"
Why not allow us to fight after the game has officially ended? Let us keep lobbing nukes. let us play till were done or 100% Seems weird to me that the main point of the game can also be the thing that ends it.

And even if you wont let us do it vanilla, make it a victory condition of some kind and then give us the option to play past "game over"

Unit types are a little boring. But not game killing

IMO I think the war planner tool is really cool. and the way youre able to launch a nightmare volley of nukes at your peers is wonderful

I recommend the game, but they need to fix the end game conditions

Game plays well, and is very challenging. Overall great experience.

Only anger inducing part is the DLC. -- 40$ game, with 182$ in DLC. Seriously?

Most of the DLC's should be apart of the game by default. Because without them, you will have about 1-2 playthroughs before the game is boring.

blow stuff up

The game is INCREDIBLE. It's just the devs & studio that inevitably gave my beloved PA a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ reputation.

Gameplay still spearheads the RTS industry in unequivocal destruction, basebuilding, and strategy.

pathfinding needs work, but Im sure when they release their next expandalone we might hopefully see this get better

From my own experience, this was a briefly fun title.

As someone who doesnt often go into the MMORPG realm, this game was a refreshing welcome back into a genre that I once loved.

Giving it a little more time to add content, but still fun for what it offers

Optimization is next to non-existent.

You'll get 60 FPS in your first game. and then after the next match loads up, it looks like it switches to Integrated CPU graphics giving you like 20-30 fps.

I shouldnt have to perform a host of sidebar tasks to try and boost my frame-rate. Especially when my computer meets EVERY system requirement and then some.

343 is obviously no different than the other Triple A companies releasing half finished cash grabs.

343, Activision, Ubisoft, EA -- Whats the F&$%ing difference anymore

Spent more time than needed playing this game.

However, you will find yourself absolutely demolishing players, and find that it's very, very satisfying to do so.

Quick and easy games, will also make for some of the sweatiest moments of your life.

It's a good game. Even better when you get it on sale.

The versatility in what can do, and play in this game has truly made it one of the most replayable games in my catalog.

Between the campaign & mission editor, and the plethora of different game modes like Altis life, king of the hill, and at one point PUBG -- you will find no shortage of things to do.



That being said, the DLC's are the biggest pain. So many DLC's and not nearly enough money to buy them all.

lots of fun, highly recommend if you like carnage and parkour

crushing people in a competitive environment is insanely addicting.

pros-

+ Learning different heroes and their abilities whilst learning what items are best bought with them and in what order leads to endless possibilities
+ Game is smooth, and has the option of longer, or shorter duration games.
+ Lots of depth, endless heroes
+ Insanely competitive, comparable to csgo
+ Deep strategy
+ Roles for just about every type of gameplay style

cons-

- This community is outrageously toxic. The players are the worst part about the game hands down. You will either mute your teammates, or you will find yourself reported consistently for things you didnt even do.

- The punishments and the reporting system is horrendous, anyone can report you, and anyone can make it so typing and communicating is taken away from you as a punishment.

- Queue times