Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For example, Doom Eternal would load levels in a few seconds on my SSD compared to my brother-in-law's HDD would would take 30sec or more.
SSD is best for loading times, NVMEs are even better especially for games that want an SSD. So SSD/NVME is best for an OS drive and games that practically require an SSD like Starfield.
It instantly reboots your PC, and big games like Rust went from loading a server in 20 mins, to 1 min now.
Other than big games loading faster, i saw no noticeable difference, but absolutely love the drive stick for my C: Drive!
Today, id say Samsung is the leader brand for those.
SSD is alright, very crunchy but doesn't taste like much.
LSD is best, very small, easy to eat and room turns into kaleidoscope.
SSDs give you high speed fast boots and loading.
HDDs are slower, burn more power but cost significantly less per gig than an SSD
That is true as well, though I think most games are probably going to peak at that point. Still, it is something to consider if you play a lot of AAA games - though even then, not all of them reach that big. There's still a lot of major releases I can think of in recent times that cap out at in the 50-80GB range.
Just depends on what kind of games you tend to play, I suppose.