• Fixed case where disbanded unit might not reform at the start of a new Operation. • Increased spotting ability against units with no cover at all. • Slightly increased vehicle spotting ability. • Fixed case where ‘unknown error’ might be improperly reported when logging into multi-player lobby. • .50 caliber machine guns now prefer ball ammo vs. infantry instead of leaving AP loaded and ‘saving ammo.’ • Added support for a flamethrower firing animation, for use by mod makers....

You already had the golden goose, Close Combat was the king of top down 2D real time historical tactical wargaming, you had that crown, the CC concept is solid and the potential for improvement and development of that concept is limited only by your imaginations. The fact that it's 2D is its strength, it meant you could focus on all the other stuff like depth, the mechanics, the AI, scale, more dynamic campaigns etc. But you just had to ignore what everyone else can see and go down the 3D route, the road ...

I just heard of Close combat recently after playing a similar game to it called firefight, which one do you recommend I try as a new player first?

Hi guys, while we will do our best to support you here, if your posts goes unanswered we recommend you post your query on our forum where the development team will see it. It's also likely you'll get faster responses to any queries and there are hundreds of players online at any time to answer questions. The Close Combat: The Bloody First discussion forum is here: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1254...

hi legends! As per title I'm wondering if the game is actually enjoyable or it's not worth the hassle. Should I just skip it for something else or should I smash that buy button? thank you for any advice