The minimum card on this is a 670, which is more powerful than the 750m. Even if it's a series ahead, the 750m is from an era when NVidia was shoving much weaker versions of its cards in laptops (for instance, the 670m is much slower than the base 670).

User Benchmark uses a 2060 Super as a default to measure against. The 670 has a 27.7% Effective 3D Speed, the 750m gets a 7.7%.

Most tests like Lighting, Reflection, etc. the 670 gets 30-40 fps in their benchmarking tests, the 750m gets below 15 fps. Again, the 670 is a minimum requirement for the game; I'm impressed you got a 750m to push it through that well.

From what I know, having to downscale a game like this would be pretty expected. Hopefully, you were still able to enjoy it.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Basilicus:

The minimum card on this is a 670, which is more powerful than the 750m. Even if it's a series ahead, the 750m is from an era when NVidia was shoving much weaker versions of its cards in laptops (for instance, the 670m is much slower than the base 670).

User Benchmark uses a 2060 Super as a default to measure against. The 670 has a 27.7% Effective 3D Speed, the 750m gets a 7.7%.

Most tests like Lighting, Reflection, etc. the 670 gets 30-40 fps in their benchmarking tests, the 750m gets below 15 fps. Again, the 670 is a minimum requirement for the game; I'm impressed you got a 750m to push it through that well.

From what I know, having to downscale a game like this would be pretty expected. Hopefully, you were still able to enjoy it.

Thank you for your time. I understand the issue, I tought the 750m was more powerful but i was mistaken.

There are a few important things to understand about video cards that most people don't.

Both AMD and Nvidia "cheat" on the names of their cards. The first example that comes to mind is RTX 3050 vs. RTX 3050 (OEM) vs. RTX 3050 (6GB). More honest would be to call them 3050 / 3045 / 3040.

These are based on different GPUs, have different numbers of cores, TMUs and ROPs, different amounts of memory, different bus interfaces and speeds, different maximum frequencies and bandwidths, and will result in different performance.

The next thing is desktop vs. laptop. The desktop RTX 3070 has little to do with the laptop RTX 3070. Both use GA104 silicon, but the desktop GPU has 5888 CUDA cores compared to just 5120 in the laptop, and the boost clock speeds are also over 100 MHz lower on the laptop in the best cases.

And then there is laptop vs. laptop. Sometimes the RTX 3060 can actually be faster than the RTX 3070, or the exact same RTX 3070 in one laptop will be faster in one laptop than in another. This is not "cheating", but a result of the build quality and the maximum TGP allowed for a card.

For example, the maximum TGP allowed by the card manufacturer is 115W, but the computer manufacturer sets the TGP to 95, 80, 60, or 45W. The higher the TGP, the more cooling (and noise) is required; the lower the TGP, the less expensive the cooling system.

In conclusion, a laptop is basically never a good option for gaming, and the user needs to do their research before buying. Laptops will always have less power and be slower than their desktop counterparts, will always be much louder, will more often have driver issues, and in a few years you won't be able to just swap in a better video card.

* Some laptops use the manufacturer's specific tweaks, and updated drivers might be pretty sparse, if they ever appear at all.

A good starting point before buying new hardware is a notebookcheck website.


Addendum:
For the reference:

https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-RTX-4070-Laptop-GPU-vs-GeForce-GT-750M_11453_4158.247598.0.html

https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-Best-Gaming-Notebooks.98628.0.html

https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GT-750M.90245.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.com/Intel-Core-i7-4700MQ-Notebook-Prozessor.92207.0.html

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-MSI-GE60H-i765M2811B-Notebook.104693.0.html