i agree, this should be a thing.

as a temporary fix you are able to limit your FPS via your gpu settings. both nvidia and amd have this option now. if you have an amd gpu and have trouble finding it, hit me up :)

I cant limit fps via amd control panel....

*push*
Yea, please put in a "max fps" setting

I mean, the game has VSync.....

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pisaro27:

I mean, the game has VSync.....

Wow, I'm a dumdum. I just tried it out and it works, thank you.

Why would you want to limit your FPS?

Ursprünglich geschrieben von markljs=):

Why would you want to limit your FPS?

Because you should limited you fps to your monitor refresh rate. More fps are useless and your hardware don't need to go all out.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pisaro27:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von markljs=):

Why would you want to limit your FPS?

Because you should limited you fps to your monitor refresh rate. More fps are useless and your hardware don't need to go all out.

that's wrong. higher fps will ALWAYS result in a better experience. even if your monitor is locked on 60hz, 250fps will look smoother than 60.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pisaro27:

Because you should limited you fps to your monitor refresh rate. More fps are useless and your hardware don't need to go all out.

that's wrong. higher fps will ALWAYS result in a better experience. even if your monitor is locked on 60hz, 250fps will look smoother than 60.

Nope, THAT is in facts wrong. Only a few games make that right, engine wise like counter strike. Most games don't do that.

Try it. 144 FPS on 60hz Monitor and then 144FPS on 144Hz Monitor.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pisaro27:

Because you should limited you fps to your monitor refresh rate. More fps are useless and your hardware don't need to go all out.

that's wrong. higher fps will ALWAYS result in a better experience. even if your monitor is locked on 60hz, 250fps will look smoother than 60.

Iff you want to burn your CPU and do unnessesairy damage to your computer, keep at it m8.


1700 FPS on unity is a hefty toll for CPU's no matter if you can run it or not. It doesnt warrant your hardware lifespan as that will be cut drastic short.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pisaro27:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

that's wrong. higher fps will ALWAYS result in a better experience. even if your monitor is locked on 60hz, 250fps will look smoother than 60.

Nope, THAT is in facts wrong. Only a few games make that right, engine wise like counter strike. Most games don't do that.

Try it. 144 FPS on 60hz Monitor and then 144FPS on 144Hz Monitor.

of course 144fps will look better on a 144hz monitor than on a 60hz monitor? i'm not sure what your point is. doesn't change the fact that 144fps on 60hz looks better than 60fps on 60hz.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von GamingWithSilvertail:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

that's wrong. higher fps will ALWAYS result in a better experience. even if your monitor is locked on 60hz, 250fps will look smoother than 60.

Iff you want to burn your CPU and do unnessesairy damage to your computer, keep at it m8.


1700 FPS on unity is a hefty toll for CPU's no matter if you can run it or not. It doesnt warrant your hardware lifespan as that will be cut drastic short.

why would i burn my hardware like that? i haven't mentioned those kind of numbers anywhere. don't know what your point is over here. i still cap my fps on 90 on my 60hz monitor for this game.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von GamingWithSilvertail:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

that's wrong. higher fps will ALWAYS result in a better experience. even if your monitor is locked on 60hz, 250fps will look smoother than 60.

Iff you want to burn your CPU and do unnessesairy damage to your computer, keep at it m8.


1700 FPS on unity is a hefty toll for CPU's no matter if you can run it or not. It doesnt warrant your hardware lifespan as that will be cut drastic short.

Yeah, under 10 seconds with 1700 frames will definetly burn your computer. Wake up.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von GamingWithSilvertail:

Iff you want to burn your CPU and do unnessesairy damage to your computer, keep at it m8.


1700 FPS on unity is a hefty toll for CPU's no matter if you can run it or not. It doesnt warrant your hardware lifespan as that will be cut drastic short.

why would i burn my hardware like that? i haven't mentioned those kind of numbers anywhere. don't know what your point is over here. i still cap my fps on 90 on my 60hz monitor for this game.

you dont need more than 60 FPS on a 60 Hz Monitor in 98% of all Games. Its fact and stated my some real compurer magacines/forums etc. Its a 100% fact.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pisaro27:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von fakeRR:

why would i burn my hardware like that? i haven't mentioned those kind of numbers anywhere. don't know what your point is over here. i still cap my fps on 90 on my 60hz monitor for this game.

you dont need more than 60 FPS on a 60 Hz Monitor in 98% of all Games. Its fact and stated my some real compurer magacines/forums etc. Its a 100% fact.

well let's agree to disagree on that thing i can test anytime with my 60hz monitor and know that i'm right :) have a good day