$20 season pass for two full size expansions? What is this, 2010? You guys are the best!

Из ящиков не берутся предметы!

Brian, at least :)

I just bought this one :P

Time to reinstall :-)

Thanks for the DLC :-)

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย October the Octopus:

$20 season pass for two full size expansions? What is this, 2010? You guys are the best!

No, because if it would be 2010 you'd have to pay 0$ for expansions since until 2013 Brian was making fun about the industry cuting cotent out and making a game feel unfinished only to then use DLCs to make money. But I guess either Microsoft used a Spine-Removal-Ray-Caster or being able to revive an old classic in a great way does not mean you had one to begin with.
So be happy paying only 20$ and just ignore that that's 20$ more then you had to pay for Wastelands 2 DLC which still is the better game.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย r-cane:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย October the Octopus:

$20 season pass for two full size expansions? What is this, 2010? You guys are the best!

No, because if it would be 2010 you'd have to pay 0$ for expansions since until 2013 Brian was making fun about the industry cuting cotent out and making a game feel unfinished only to then use DLCs to make money. But I guess either Microsoft used a Spine-Removal-Ray-Caster or being able to revive an old classic in a great way does not mean you had one to begin with.
So be happy paying only 20$ and just ignore that that's 20$ more then you had to pay for Wastelands 2 DLC which still is the better game.

You sound very bitter.

How long is it?

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย MetsuTDK:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย r-cane:

No, because if it would be 2010 you'd have to pay 0$ for expansions since until 2013 Brian was making fun about the industry cuting cotent out and making a game feel unfinished only to then use DLCs to make money. But I guess either Microsoft used a Spine-Removal-Ray-Caster or being able to revive an old classic in a great way does not mean you had one to begin with.
So be happy paying only 20$ and just ignore that that's 20$ more then you had to pay for Wastelands 2 DLC which still is the better game.

You sound very bitter.

Not bitter, just realy disappointed. Seeing Wastelands 3 getting absurd humor that doesn't do anything to add immersion or a better roleplaying feel and trying to get cosy with all the people who think RPGs are about tactical challenges made me realize, that when I played Wastelands 2 and had a blast and hoped that this was just the start of reviving good Isometric-Post-Apocalypse-RPG these hopes didn't come to fruition. Now I see that to many of those games lay way to much focus on combat and providing the players a feeling of achieving something by overcoming those combat challenges by creating "builds" rather then letting the players just experience an immersive world where the "goal" is to actualy play a character and empathicly trying to find out what it feels like to live in this world and how a character (or even yourself) would act in such a context.

Sooo bitter.

Oi! Let's not forget that in the original Wasteland, one of your first combat encounters is with a grown ass man in a bunny suit. Absurd humor has always been a part of the franchise.

If we get NG+ before the next DLC I'll let Brian Fargo be my power bottom.

Worth the money,and the support if you love the game,plain and simple. Between the dlc and the last update,it makes the game even more amazing,very rarely does an update and a dlc make an entire game feel fresh,but this one succeeds on every level. thanks again guys.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย r-cane:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย MetsuTDK:

You sound very bitter.

Not bitter, just realy disappointed. Seeing Wastelands 3 getting absurd humor that doesn't do anything to add immersion or a better roleplaying feel and trying to get cosy with all the people who think RPGs are about tactical challenges made me realize, that when I played Wastelands 2 and had a blast and hoped that this was just the start of reviving good Isometric-Post-Apocalypse-RPG these hopes didn't come to fruition. Now I see that to many of those games lay way to much focus on combat and providing the players a feeling of achieving something by overcoming those combat challenges by creating "builds" rather then letting the players just experience an immersive world where the "goal" is to actualy play a character and empathicly trying to find out what it feels like to live in this world and how a character (or even yourself) would act in such a context.

now its all about patsying to geopolitical ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and fk the real concept the game got based on

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย r-cane:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย MetsuTDK:

You sound very bitter.

Not bitter, just realy disappointed. Seeing Wastelands 3 getting absurd humor that doesn't do anything to add immersion or a better roleplaying feel and trying to get cosy with all the people who think RPGs are about tactical challenges made me realize, that when I played Wastelands 2 and had a blast and hoped that this was just the start of reviving good Isometric-Post-Apocalypse-RPG these hopes didn't come to fruition. Now I see that to many of those games lay way to much focus on combat and providing the players a feeling of achieving something by overcoming those combat challenges by creating "builds" rather then letting the players just experience an immersive world where the "goal" is to actualy play a character and empathicly trying to find out what it feels like to live in this world and how a character (or even yourself) would act in such a context.

We already got that you were bitter the first time, chief