no

Me too, FSR2 is horrible implemented in DL2 and FSR1 so bad, that I can take off my glasses and see no differences at all, everything is extremly blurry with or without my glasses.

Okay, Nvidia was partner for this game, but they really don´t need to stick the middlefinger right in the faces of AMD users.

i need this asap, my game is dying

i hope FSR3 will come

the problem you have is "FSR" trash software. buy nvidia. dlss is great

Messaggio originale di Elliott:

the problem you have is "FSR" trash software. buy nvidia. dlss is great

I will be buying an Nvidia card, just as soon as they aren't 300% more than AMD cards.

FSR 3.1 official launch with sony games, when can we expect the implementation in this one, because 2.0 is incredible ghosting and bad.

nvidia fangirls are cringe, fsr3 is available on consoles and a huge spectrum of cards.
dlss 3 is only on 4k series.

looking at comparison videos of fsr3 and dlss3, the difference in performance is so slight in most cases, then you turn on framegen and fsr 3 has about a 10-15% increase on performance. let me add a cute addition, the nvidia 2k, 3k and 4k series all have a AI chip on them, which runs DLSS, you can't activate dlss without a specific signature the AI chip has.

and the fact almost all of the dlss3/ fsr3 use a nvidia gpu in which the AI chip automatically gets advantage over, boils down to the reality of. (how is fsr3 performing better with framegen on 4k "graphics" than DLSS 3 when it has a AI chip backing it?)

there's just things fangirls of Nvidia always overlook and they like the brag and squander about how much better nvidia is, but the argument over which gpu is better died some time ago. todays age there's not really much of a difference in the cards that even require people to need a specific card for.

btw AMD is performaing better on Warzone/cod games which is the most graphics intensive based (competitive) game(s) out.

DLSS may look slightly better, but performance matters most. and FSR is slightly better in that field. even compared to an AI chip dedicated towards running DLSS.

get CLAPPED Nvidia fangirl.

AMD IS KING.

i cant believe they didnt even add the FSR 3.0
but i hope they gonna add the new one (FSR 3.1).

ig they we wont get fsr 3(3.1) this year in dl2, and probably first half of 2025 also wont bring fsr 3(3.1) to dl2
it would be funny if they announced that fsr 3 will be available in dying light 2 soon and never release it
(https://community.amd.com/t5/gaming/amd-fsr-3-1-announced-at-gdc-2024-fsr-3-available-and-upcoming/ba-p/674027)

https://www.amd.com/pt/products/graphics/technologies/fidelityfx/super-resolution.html

I also hope for FSR 3

Yeah FSR 3.1 would be nice to have. If not then FSR 3.1 in the beast.

Messaggio originale di Mattman:

nvidia fangirls are cringe, fsr3 is available on consoles and a huge spectrum of cards.
dlss 3 is only on 4k series.

looking at comparison videos of fsr3 and dlss3, the difference in performance is so slight in most cases, then you turn on framegen and fsr 3 has about a 10-15% increase on performance. let me add a cute addition, the nvidia 2k, 3k and 4k series all have a AI chip on them, which runs DLSS, you can't activate dlss without a specific signature the AI chip has.

and the fact almost all of the dlss3/ fsr3 use a nvidia gpu in which the AI chip automatically gets advantage over, boils down to the reality of. (how is fsr3 performing better with framegen on 4k "graphics" than DLSS 3 when it has a AI chip backing it?)

there's just things fangirls of Nvidia always overlook and they like the brag and squander about how much better nvidia is, but the argument over which gpu is better died some time ago. todays age there's not really much of a difference in the cards that even require people to need a specific card for.

btw AMD is performaing better on Warzone/cod games which is the most graphics intensive based (competitive) game(s) out.

DLSS may look slightly better, but performance matters most. and FSR is slightly better in that field. even compared to an AI chip dedicated towards running DLSS.

get CLAPPED Nvidia fangirl.

AMD IS KING.

Yeah yeah...And those more than 70 fps boost in the most games is what exactly ? I understand you prefer AMD, but many people prefer NVIDIA. I would never touch any AMD graphic card in my life (for example). And that's about it. I never even considered buying anything else than NVIDIA :). But as I mentioned, many people prefer AMD and many people NVIDIA. Either way, you cannot deny the fact, that the boost of DLSS and RTX 4K series ''frame generation'' DLSS 3 is something else. In many games you get even 60-90 fps boost :). And btw, wasn't Dying Light 2 actually partner with NVIDIA ? As you can see on starting up the game (if I remember correctly). So ofc, they will prioritize DLSS. You wrote many arguments how FSR 3 is bit better...Well, it goes game to game and let me tell you...I am pretty sure I will get like 50% more fps with frame generation in half of the games on market than on AMD card due to better compatibility with nvidia cards :).

fsr3 is still on amd website waiting for what a joke on 21-12-2024...i have rtx 3060 ti