As soon as I sell a kidney..........

Not unless one of them is 200W TDP or less, 50% or more faster than a 4070 in raster, and 500 USD or less.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Draxuss:

As soon as I sell a kidney..........

Yeah lol

deeaam lucky you where you from? becuse you know every country is different ,special for europe countries is high price !

United States, 😆 you don’t know how’s it gonna for us with the tariffs for gpu pricing. It’s gonna be awful.

I doubt that. When 4090 launched it was over $2500 in Finland and it's still hoovering around ~$2000. I bet 5090 will easily be over $3000.

It could possibly be $3000. Well Nvidia's key note is today at 9:30 est

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Admiral:

I doubt that. When 4090 launched it was over $2500 in Finland and it's still hoovering around ~$2000. I bet 5090 will easily be over $3000.

I paid $1875 usd for my 4090 a few months ago and I don't see the 5090 as something I'll need, I should be good until the 60 series...

Quite simply, as a 4090 owner, the 5090 is the only moderately compelling card but it's gonna be a letdown i think for the entire card lineup.

The gains mostly seem based on multiframe gen. So those with 40x cards can still use the new dlss and original single frame gen. But twice faster than X card is all based on 3 free frames. So if I had to ballpark a guess it's about a 30% faster improvement from 4090 to 5090 and less on the lower sku cards. Not sure what I'll do. It's easy to skip with a 4090 as frame gen and dlss guarantees a great 4k experience with the toughest games and the new cards won't really allow the absence of those features with pure compute.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Tr3m0r:

Quite simply, as a 4090 owner, the 5090 is the only moderately compelling card but it's gonna be a letdown i think for the entire card lineup.

The gains mostly seem based on multiframe gen. So those with 40x cards can still use the new dlss and original single frame gen. But twice faster than X card is all based on 3 free frames. So if I had to ballpark a guess it's about a 30% faster improvement from 4090 to 5090 and less on the lower sku cards. Not sure what I'll do. It's easy to skip with a 4090 as frame gen and dlss guarantees a great 4k experience with the toughest games and the new cards won't really allow the absence of those features with pure compute.

I'm glad I have a 4090, I never use frame gen. It looks like crap...

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Tr3m0r:

Quite simply, as a 4090 owner, the 5090 is the only moderately compelling card but it's gonna be a letdown i think for the entire card lineup.

The gains mostly seem based on multiframe gen. So those with 40x cards can still use the new dlss and original single frame gen. But twice faster than X card is all based on 3 free frames. So if I had to ballpark a guess it's about a 30% faster improvement from 4090 to 5090 and less on the lower sku cards. Not sure what I'll do. It's easy to skip with a 4090 as frame gen and dlss guarantees a great 4k experience with the toughest games and the new cards won't really allow the absence of those features with pure compute.

What a great point! I absolutely agree nvidia usually lies about how much peformance is really being gained.

The price is not the problem; the problem is the ridiculously high cost of electricity.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von PaulKrawitz:

The price is not the problem; the problem is the ridiculously high cost of electricity.

Yeah lol. Well you can use it as a space heater.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Sean:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von PaulKrawitz:

The price is not the problem; the problem is the ridiculously high cost of electricity.

Yeah lol. Well you can use it as a space heater.

51 cents per kilowatt hour would be quite an expensive heater...

Yeah. It would be an expensive heater.