Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
GO with Linux - Mint if you dont have HDR , otherwise go with Nobara KDE
It's basically just Archlinux, but with an installer which quite literally installs the system how I would've done it by hand, while compiling all packages for X86-64_V3. This raises the system requirements (sorry thinkpad users), yet can give a pretty nice performance boost.
Edit: They also ship packages with some patches. Like they patched KDE in wayland mode to actually allow screen tearing to occur when set to do so in the settings. It appears broken (at least to me) on other distros. This is very important for gaming.
Worst possible advice ever.
Very bad idea.
Nooooo.
Nuh, he wants a single answer. That's Mint.
Mint is a solid choice. Over about 25 years of using linux that's the one that's usually been the most straightforward, in my experience.
How about an install time of 10+ hours for LFS... :-)
It's mostly just preference but if you want things to be more stable and not have to do anything about it, stick to LTS options like Pop!_OS, Mint, etc. If you don't care then rolling releases like Nobara Linux and CachyOS are fine.
one of the reasons why valve switched from debian to arch linux for steamos and since the arch linux team also works directly with valve, you will be best served. If you also don't just run updates, but also check the archlinux news to see if there is anything to consider. you can also use a pacman hook so that you can see it directly in the terminal before updating, then you save yourself the way via the browser and there are usually no problems.
also nvidia users will benefit the most with arch linux because new features come the fastest ( you can also simply set up dual boot... one lts version and one with rolling release...
or you install arch linux with btrfs and then with snapper... if an update goes wrong you simply boot another snapshot. )
Rolling release only really matters for GPU drivers when there's something major that comes up, like months ago when open source modules came out and when Wayland started working properly with NVIDIA video cards, or when there's a new generation of video cards, which isn't going to be problem until next year for people who are going to be buying into RTX 50 series.
That said, OP is more than likely looking at a current notebook and their focus is on stability, they don't need a rolling release, it comes down to preference, but because LTS releases are almost always stable when they come out, that's what I would recommend. Users seeking the absolute maximum performance they can get from the OS and kernel should absolutely be looking into something like Nobara or Arch. But you really can't go wrong with either LTS or rolling release, it's mostly preference, and I use both.
550 is the latest production branch, and 560 is the latest new-feature branch.
Apologies to the OP for going off in the weeds here - I realize this sort of trivia isn't what you asked for. (Note: not clear to me whether you're new to Linux.)