Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
JP BP was seeing a decline for a long time. With every patch Bandai did, the game got worse and more players left.
It is all because of poor development team and Bandai. This was happening before making a contract with Amazon.
You pushing misinformation shows how blindly enraged you are against Amazon.
My point is that: probably a western launch would give the game some life.
I’ve played for a while in JP servers and sincerely it wasn’t a bad game at all, comparing with western games, probably it would have a better performance than new world
Sorry, but the clients performance was trash and this was a client for the western audience.
So you're saying that Amazon did bad work with the western version.
If they had a clue what they were doing, they would just translate stuff accurate and bring the game over.
But the fact that they managed it to not just make a non working client, but also break a functioning game is impressive to me.
JP client began failing right after launch. It was more about predatory shops than it was about content or gameplay.
You can keep blaming AG but it shows only one thing, you never choose reality.
Publisher changing actively code in the game.
By the time the technical test was happening were the problems not known in the JP Version.
If Amazon was using the same Launcher and Game Version, there should not have been problems.
But there is more than enough evidence that the problems came from them and not Bandai in that case.
As it is usual for Amazon, everything they touch turns to trash.
New World
Lost Ark
That Throne game thats already DoA
If you think the game failed just because of predatory shops.
Boy do I have a essay for you, about that topic.
The shop was not the reason the game flopped, it's just the easiest scapegoat.
Sept 3rd 2023
You are wrong
Thank you!
You have just proven that you have no idea, what you are talking about.
You are saying that lacking game content is the same as stability issues and technical problems, breaking the game essentialy is the same as not having content once you hit max level.
Thats like comparing a apple to the moon.
The client of the technical test was unstable.
You cannot change the game without changing codes and files.
Whatever Amazone did for the technical test, they did extremely bad work.
That has nothing to do, with the game having bad/non existant endgame content and a very bad ingame shop.
-class balance
-microtransactions
-bad endgame grind
-poor grind in general
-horrid class decisions
-several issues with skills
-and predatory gacha
All this before the technical test. Oh and it was the JP client.
Your character is known.
You have already proven you don't know a thing.
Imma be a bit more clear now.
The failure of the technical test is solely on Amazon.
The technical tests problems, all were new and were not on the JP client.
Lost Ark had similar problems during it's release process and after release.
As the game client was made new.
Furthermore their meddeling with the game files, cause stability issues, crashes and graphical problems.
This is solely on Amazon as these problems did not exist in the JP version.
I stand correct, Amazon is at fault for this.
Thats not the client, thats the game.
A client is what is the general described as a running game.
If you launch BP thats the client.
The client was new, the game wasn't.
The point is hot air, as it is not related to the post at all.
So far my track record is positive.
I choose to ignore things unrelated to the game client, as it was not part of the point.
To point it out again, it was about the client, not the content inside the game.
Apples and the Moon.
And yet the technical test was a non functioning mess, while the JP version was functioning normal and had none of the issues from the technical test.
What was caused by Amazons changes they made.
So it is again their fault.
Kiana Kaslana from the game Honkai Impact 1-3.
Amazon Games tends to choose games that suck from the beginning onwards.
Bandai Namco is known to publish bad MMORPGs as well:
Bless Unleashed, published by Bandai Namco: https://www.bandainamcoent.com/news/bless-unleashed-sunset
Winning Putt, published by Bandai Namco: https://gtm.you1.cn/games/458960/announcements/detail/1684803832137894155 Basically, have two of the worst choosers of MMORPG IPs pick a game. Yeah, nothing is going to go wrong here!
Whatever was going to happen would have happened w/ or w/o Amazon Games. That is the Bandai Namco curse of not being great at picking good IPs to push forward.
Most popular mobile MMORPGs in Japan:
Lineage 2M for its PvP.
Lineage 2R for its PvP.
Dark Athena for its art-style.
Even without Bandai Namco, Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is dead on arrival. Especially since it is that fake "reactive" tab-target stuff.
Why you would lie and gaslight about this when people can check public dates is beyond me.