Blue Protocol

Blue Protocol

Amazon(ia) games
I literally blame A.G. for the poor performance of BP. And you must immediately ask: HOW SO?!

Delaying its worldwide launch with the excuse of lolis severely limited the game and the feedback it received.

"Oh, but the game is trashy"—the only problem right now is the monetization and the lack of resources to keep the game running in Asia. One issue seems to be directly connected to the other, right?

A.G. has a cursed hand, and every game it touches seems destined to fail.

They destroyed New World, turned the beta test of Throne and Liberty into a freak show, and Lost Ark? It's a P2W freak show as well.

I don't see how investing in B.P. would be a "problem" for Amazon since they've already spent resources altering game files and translating, and they still insists on New World that they've made literally like... unplayable?
Messaggio originale di Cipher Esteria:
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
No, they are only the publisher. The technical test failure was entirely the fault of Bandai Online.

JP client began failing right after launch. It was more about predatory shops than it was about content or gameplay.

You can keep blaming AG but it shows only one thing, you never choose reality.

Publisher changing actively code in the game.

By the time the technical test was happening were the problems not known in the JP Version.
If Amazon was using the same Launcher and Game Version, there should not have been problems.

But there is more than enough evidence that the problems came from them and not Bandai in that case.

As it is usual for Amazon, everything they touch turns to trash.
New World
Lost Ark
That Throne game thats already DoA

If you think the game failed just because of predatory shops.
Boy do I have a essay for you, about that topic.
The shop was not the reason the game flopped, it's just the easiest scapegoat.
< >
Visualizzazione di 1-15 commenti su 17
I wonder how long throne and liberty will last
False

JP BP was seeing a decline for a long time. With every patch Bandai did, the game got worse and more players left.

It is all because of poor development team and Bandai. This was happening before making a contract with Amazon.

You pushing misinformation shows how blindly enraged you are against Amazon.
Messaggio originale di One Punch Ace:
I wonder how long throne and liberty will last
Probably quite a while. Bandai is not the developer
Messaggio originale di One Punch Ace:
I wonder how long throne and liberty will last
Probably not much. It already has no player base
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
False

JP BP was seeing a decline for a long time. With every patch Bandai did, the game got worse and more players left.

It is all because of poor development team and Bandai. This was happening before making a contract with Amazon.

You pushing misinformation shows how blindly enraged you are against Amazon.

My point is that: probably a western launch would give the game some life.

I’ve played for a while in JP servers and sincerely it wasn’t a bad game at all, comparing with western games, probably it would have a better performance than new world
Ultima modifica da Kurogane; 5 set, ore 5:33
Messaggio originale di Kurogane:
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
False

JP BP was seeing a decline for a long time. With every patch Bandai did, the game got worse and more players left.

It is all because of poor development team and Bandai. This was happening before making a contract with Amazon.

You pushing misinformation shows how blindly enraged you are against Amazon.

My point is that: probably a western launch would give the game some life.

I’ve played for a while in JP servers and sincerely it wasn’t a bad game at all, comparing with western games, probably it would have a better performance than new world
During the technical test the most common game breaking bug was a client shutdown every 5 to 10 minutes. Then you had massive stutters, graphical artifacts that were consistent,and interface errors.

Sorry, but the clients performance was trash and this was a client for the western audience.
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
During the technical test the most common game breaking bug was a client shutdown every 5 to 10 minutes. Then you had massive stutters, graphical artifacts that were consistent,and interface errors.

Sorry, but the clients performance was trash and this was a client for the western audience.

So you're saying that Amazon did bad work with the western version.
If they had a clue what they were doing, they would just translate stuff accurate and bring the game over.
But the fact that they managed it to not just make a non working client, but also break a functioning game is impressive to me.
Messaggio originale di Cipher Esteria:
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
During the technical test the most common game breaking bug was a client shutdown every 5 to 10 minutes. Then you had massive stutters, graphical artifacts that were consistent,and interface errors.

Sorry, but the clients performance was trash and this was a client for the western audience.

So you're saying that Amazon did bad work with the western version.
If they had a clue what they were doing, they would just translate stuff accurate and bring the game over.
But the fact that they managed it to not just make a non working client, but also break a functioning game is impressive to me.
No, they are only the publisher. The technical test failure was entirely the fault of Bandai Online.

JP client began failing right after launch. It was more about predatory shops than it was about content or gameplay.

You can keep blaming AG but it shows only one thing, you never choose reality.
L'autore della discussione ha indicato che questo messaggio risponde alla discussione originale.
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
No, they are only the publisher. The technical test failure was entirely the fault of Bandai Online.

JP client began failing right after launch. It was more about predatory shops than it was about content or gameplay.

You can keep blaming AG but it shows only one thing, you never choose reality.

Publisher changing actively code in the game.

By the time the technical test was happening were the problems not known in the JP Version.
If Amazon was using the same Launcher and Game Version, there should not have been problems.

But there is more than enough evidence that the problems came from them and not Bandai in that case.

As it is usual for Amazon, everything they touch turns to trash.
New World
Lost Ark
That Throne game thats already DoA

If you think the game failed just because of predatory shops.
Boy do I have a essay for you, about that topic.
The shop was not the reason the game flopped, it's just the easiest scapegoat.
Messaggio originale di Cipher Esteria:
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
No, they are only the publisher. The technical test failure was entirely the fault of Bandai Online.

JP client began failing right after launch. It was more about predatory shops than it was about content or gameplay.

You can keep blaming AG but it shows only one thing, you never choose reality.

Publisher changing actively code in the game.

By the time the technical test was happening were the problems not known in the JP Version.
If Amazon was using the same Launcher and Game Version, there should not have been problems.

But there is more than enough evidence that the problems came from them and not Bandai in that case.

As it is usual for Amazon, everything they touch turns to trash.
New World
Lost Ark
That Throne game thats already DoA

If you think the game failed just because of predatory shops.
Boy do I have a essay for you, about that topic.
The shop was not the reason the game flopped, it's just the easiest scapegoat.
https://www.thegamer.com/blue-protocol-amazon-games/
Sept 3rd 2023

If you’ve been following Blue Protocol closely, it’s likely you’ve heard of the problems the game is facing in Japan. Following an “emergency livestream” hosted two weeks ago by Bandai Namco, over 50 percent of players claimed they were dissatisfied with the answers provided with regard to class balance, microtransactions, and the overall weak endgame grind. There are a number of issues with the game, including the restrictions of Adventure Boards making grinding un-fun, confusing class decisions (are there tanks and healers, or not?), and issues with the viability of the different skills. That’s without even mentioning the gacha mechanics that act as the overall foundations.

You are wrong
Ultima modifica da EvilHare; 5 set, ore 15:28
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:

You are wrong

Thank you!
You have just proven that you have no idea, what you are talking about.

You are saying that lacking game content is the same as stability issues and technical problems, breaking the game essentialy is the same as not having content once you hit max level.
Thats like comparing a apple to the moon.

The client of the technical test was unstable.
You cannot change the game without changing codes and files.
Whatever Amazone did for the technical test, they did extremely bad work.
That has nothing to do, with the game having bad/non existant endgame content and a very bad ingame shop.
Messaggio originale di Cipher Esteria:
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:

You are wrong

Thank you!
You have just proven that you have no idea, what you are talking about.

You are saying that lacking game content is the same as stability issues and technical problems, breaking the game essentialy is the same as not having content once you hit max level.
Thats like comparing a apple to the moon.

The client of the technical test was unstable.
You cannot change the game without changing codes and files.
Whatever Amazone did for the technical test, they did extremely bad work.
That has nothing to do, with the game having bad/non existant endgame content and a very bad ingame shop.
It is more than game content. But you chose to ignore the rest to make your point the only one valid in the list.
-class balance
-microtransactions
-bad endgame grind
-poor grind in general
-horrid class decisions
-several issues with skills
-and predatory gacha

All this before the technical test. Oh and it was the JP client.

Your character is known.
Ah yeah, I know this technique, don't worry.
You have already proven you don't know a thing.
Imma be a bit more clear now.

Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
No, they are only the publisher. The technical test failure was entirely the fault of Bandai Online.

The failure of the technical test is solely on Amazon.
The technical tests problems, all were new and were not on the JP client.
Lost Ark had similar problems during it's release process and after release.
As the game client was made new.
Furthermore their meddeling with the game files, cause stability issues, crashes and graphical problems.
This is solely on Amazon as these problems did not exist in the JP version.

I stand correct, Amazon is at fault for this.

JP client began failing right after launch. It was more about predatory shops than it was about content or gameplay.

Thats not the client, thats the game.
A client is what is the general described as a running game.
If you launch BP thats the client.

The client was new, the game wasn't.

The point is hot air, as it is not related to the post at all.

You can keep blaming AG but it shows only one thing, you never choose reality.

So far my track record is positive.

Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
It is more than game content. But you chose to ignore the rest to make your point the only one valid in the list.
-class balance
-microtransactions
-bad endgame grind
-poor grind in general
-horrid class decisions
-several issues with skills
-and predatory gacha

I choose to ignore things unrelated to the game client, as it was not part of the point.

To point it out again, it was about the client, not the content inside the game.
Apples and the Moon.

All this before the technical test. Oh and it was the JP client.

And yet the technical test was a non functioning mess, while the JP version was functioning normal and had none of the issues from the technical test.

What was caused by Amazons changes they made.
So it is again their fault.

Your character is known.

Kiana Kaslana from the game Honkai Impact 1-3.
All the Amazon Studios changes were going to happen. Especially if Bandai Namco Entertainment America/Europe were going to publish.

Amazon Games tends to choose games that suck from the beginning onwards.
Bandai Namco is known to publish bad MMORPGs as well:
Bless Unleashed, published by Bandai Namco: https://www.bandainamcoent.com/news/bless-unleashed-sunset
Winning Putt, published by Bandai Namco: https://gtm.you1.cn/games/458960/announcements/detail/1684803832137894155 Basically, have two of the worst choosers of MMORPG IPs pick a game. Yeah, nothing is going to go wrong here!

Whatever was going to happen would have happened w/ or w/o Amazon Games. That is the Bandai Namco curse of not being great at picking good IPs to push forward.

Most popular mobile MMORPGs in Japan:
Lineage 2M for its PvP.
Lineage 2R for its PvP.
Dark Athena for its art-style.

Even without Bandai Namco, Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is dead on arrival. Especially since it is that fake "reactive" tab-target stuff.
Ultima modifica da MysteryGrayLeaf; 5 set, ore 22:22
Messaggio originale di EvilHare:
False

JP BP was seeing a decline for a long time. With every patch Bandai did, the game got worse and more players left.

It is all because of poor development team and Bandai. This was happening before making a contract with Amazon.

You pushing misinformation shows how blindly enraged you are against Amazon.
The game launched LONG after their contract with Amazon. Looks like the one spreading misinformation (blatant lies) is you. Their contract was as late is 2022, possibly earlier. The game launched in 2023.

Why you would lie and gaslight about this when people can check public dates is beyond me.
Ultima modifica da Doson・ザ・ロリ好き紳士; 6 set, ore 20:09
< >
Visualizzazione di 1-15 commenti su 17
Per pagina: 1530 50