Your idea of gameplay is probably like BG3 where you can sit back clicking through dialog trees and watch cutscenes

I have to wonder why you put 170 hours into it then...

the gameplay is bad? really?
i just start ng+ last days, maybe i do wrong
i desinstall it
thank you

Цитата допису Larco:

I have to wonder why you put 170 hours into it then...

OP paid for it and will complete it no matter what. El cheapos don't value their time.

Combat was the best part of the game hands down.

Цитата допису Kingpin-cz:

Game makers don't realize that if a game is bad for gameplay and the playing time is long, new games are released. Who would bother with an unfinished game when other great games are coming out??? It's a shame for game makers that they are gambling with the patience of players. Every player is not a fanatic and would rather put the game down!! New games have just been released and the fate of this game will be messed up!!

I fthere will be a DLC, I am pretty sure there will be an eternal ferrystone too. Just as with DDDA.

I think the game is garbo tier but the combat side and sense of exploration is really good, only problem is that there needed to be more depth or more to interact with.

The gameplay is the same as DD1, minus a bunch of things that didn't need subtracting (namely, skill slots). However, like Monster Hunter, DD has a distinct kind of gameplay that may not appeal to those reared only ER or AAA goyslop style gameplay, such as in Assassin Creed or Veilguard.

Which then leads into the obvious question: Why did they change anything from DD1, when this I. P. would never appeal to "nu gamers" anyway? 😒

Цитата допису Larco:

I have to wonder why you put 170 hours into it then...

It's likely the amount of time he spent alone in the character creator with no clothes and a bottle of lotion. Possibly?

This guy. This guy gets it.

Цитата допису Despiser:

Your idea of gameplay is probably like BG3 where you can sit back clicking through dialog trees and watch cutscenes

Or like, a good game.