Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I really don't like what they did with the qunari designs in general either.
Naughty Dog *does* know how to write, the second game just happened to have some rather unfortunately poor writing, which includes Abby.
Funny, that.
I would say the writing crapped out in the first Last of Us when they wouldn't let Joel see Ellie. Ellie would have chosen death and Joel would have had no choice but to accept it. Anyone who knew Ellie at all, which Marlene who had been monitoring her for years should have, would have known the choice she would make. Instead the game tried to claim that Marlene wouldn't have the heart to kill her if she didn't do it immediately and was largely why she rushed it. An absurd plot point. It's a very artificially created but powerful end. Still a great game, but that scene was silly.
Abby's eye for an eye felt very human in comparison.
I think if Abby was at least written somewhat better, and (this is just a guess) was written less controversially, then the game would've been much better received.
But then again, they did force you to play as a character that mogged a lot of people's favorite character in the series, so that controversy would still be there.
"What does that mean?"
-"I'm not man, nor woman."
"Then what are you?"
-"Ghoooood, mooom, why do you hate me and can't respect me, I hate you."
I hope it's not a self-insert, that would make it awkward, especially that scene.
Say there was a fictional story that plays out in a world very similar to real life where the protagonist is openly racist, sexist, xenophobic, violent, hateful and fascist yet every time they and their values get tested, they are proven right and their viewpoint as universally correct.
Your position on this hypothetical work of fiction would be: "I see nothing wrong with this. That's their character. That's how they are written and supposed to be. They're not a normal person in a not normal time. It's fiction.", and you'd be just as fine with that as with anything else fictitious.
Correct?
Fair position to have, freedom of art and all, just probing if the standard is applied equally.