Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
*Make note of other thing to complain about*
Just so we're clear here. You necro'd a year old thread, which is already a violation of the Steam Discussion Guidelines, but also did so in a manner that adds nothing new to the conversation.
It's not a complete showstopper, though: a player can potentially make use of the isolation to go all-in on economic development with no need to worry about their military and then move into the wider world by way of a teleporter pact. A free city in this situation - as long as it can be contacted - becomes a no-defense-needed source of vassal income.
Thanks for your input. I must say I'm a little disappointed to receive this feedback from you. If you are the same developer that worked on Planetfall, we had many pleasant and productive exchanges (directly by email), something of which I was very happy and proud about, to contribute since I was there from the beginning of release.
You know it's funny, I had no idea, after 20 years of participation on Steam, that Necroing something was an actual violation of terms. I honestly thought it was more productive to comment on something someone already brought up than to start an entire new thread about the same subject. So, fair enough, in the future, instead of using Search and resurrecting something, I will just start from scratch. Actually easier for me to do. Please keep in mind, I just bought the game, so perhaps, I am coming in late to this conversation, however, to the best of my knowledge, the complaints / questions this thread raises has never been adequately addressed. Maybe it has been, but I didn't see it, so please bear with me.
That said, you point is well taken, perhaps I could have expressed my disbelief with less sarcasm, but as long as you are here, and thank you for jumping in, since you are an actual developer and not just a player, would you be kind enough to explain to me the reason lava creatures cannot traverse lava? And someone else made another point I was confused about, what was the reasoning behind flying creatures needing seafaring? Or if it has been discussed, perhaps you (or someone on the thread) could share the relevant link?
I'm not intending to be disrespectful here, since you were very responsive to my many comments on AOWP (if you are JE), however, I am genuinely (1) confused and (2) hoping the Devs might implement changes to the system to reflect the old AOW III rules, as one could do such things there.
Many thanks for your consideration.
If you don't mind and have a moment, I wonder if you might share the reasoning of needing seafaring for flying units? Was that a balance issue of some kind? Because I thought I had read that wrong when I started playing, it's just a confusing concept to me, again, maybe because I had played AOWIII.
Again, many thanks.