Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i'd recommend newblood's other game gloomwood. its much longer, the gameplay in my opinion is much better and it wont feel like a cake walk like this one did. i had to be a bit negative but this is probably the weakest new blood game yet. not a miss but not a hit either
What a sad reason lol.
If I like a game it has to be long. My minimum is 6-8h but optimal is 12h for single player campaign without big map.
If I don't like a game and it's short, it can't be expensive. Actual price is good but I'm speaking in general terms, not about this game.
If I went just through the level without checking for secrets it would have been ~2h.
That and they're going to have a level editor, I think it's a good deal right now.
Yeah, I understand operating on the "dollar per hour" metric lots of people go by, for example. It helps contextualize value a game offers in a more tangible way, because you can go "oh, this game costs 5 extra large candy bars" or something. I get it, makes sense why it works for a fair amount of people.
Thanks, i did not know that. I thought this is only demo.